US Federal, 8th Circuit · 2019 · Fabrication
SPV-LS, LLC v. Transamerica Life Insurance Co.
(8th Cir. 2019)
What happened
In the course of federal litigation, a key retainer agreement was produced as evidence. Forensic metadata analysis of the document, performed on the file's own stored properties, showed it had been created approximately one year after the date it purported to bear, and critically, only two days before it was submitted to the court. The timing was strong evidence that the document had been fabricated specifically for the litigation rather than created at the time of the underlying event it was meant to evidence. The attorney who produced the document faced sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(g) for submitting a document that metadata showed was likely fabricated. This case is a direct demonstration of why self-produced centralised document evidence cannot establish when a file was actually created: any Word document or PDF carries creation and modification timestamps from the user's own system, which can be set to any date by anyone with access to that system.
“Metadata analysis showed the document was created approximately one year after its purported date and two days before submission to the court.”
From the judgment
Outcome
Rule 26(g) sanctions against the attorney. Fabrication finding entered.
Sources
Public proof. Private work.
immut records a cryptographic hash of your file on the public XRP Ledger at the moment of creation. The timestamp is independently verifiable by anyone.
Anchor your evidenceEvidence Record
See all 43 rulings on record.
Jurisdiction filters, evidence-type filters, and authority sources linked on every case.