immut is the Evidence Trust Layer. It sits underneath your existing compliance tools and anchors every file to the XRP Ledger blockchain with a precise timestamp. This creates tamper-evident, independently verifiable proof that a document existed at a specific moment — court-admissible in 88 countries.

Is blockchain evidence accepted in court?

Yes. Blockchain-anchored evidence has been accepted as legal evidence in US Federal Court (US v. Sterlingov, 2024), the EUIPO across all 27 EU member states (AZ Factory v. Valeria Moda, 2025), China's Supreme People's Court (1,400+ IP cases since 2018), and under EU Regulation 2025/2531. immut certificates are accepted in 88 countries and 171 jurisdictions.

Does my file leave my device?

No. immut generates a SHA-256 hash of your file on your own device. Only the hash is recorded on the blockchain. Your original file never leaves your infrastructure. Public proof. Private work.

Does immut replace Vanta or Drata?

No. immut is the proof layer that sits underneath your existing compliance tools. Vanta and Drata collect your evidence. immut proves when that evidence existed. They complement each other — immut adds the independent timestamp your compliance platform cannot provide.

Which compliance standards does immut support?

immut produces records that satisfy evidence requirements in ISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, SOC 2, GDPR, HMRC R&D, HSE health and safety, KYC/AML, EU AI Act, HIPAA, and more. Any standard that requires dated, tamper-evident records is supported.

What happens if immut shuts down?

Every certificate already issued remains independently verifiable on the public XRP Ledger. The proof does not depend on immut existing. A regulator, a judge, or opposing counsel can verify your certificate on the public blockchain at any time, with or without immut.

Evidence Record

US Federal, Southern District of New York · 2021 · Fabrication

Rossbach v. Montefiore Medical Center

(S.D.N.Y. 2021, aff'd 2d Cir. 2022)

Screenshot fabrication

What happened

The plaintiff in a sexual harassment claim against Montefiore Medical Center produced JPEG screenshots of text messages purportedly received from a supervisor. Technical analysis of the screenshots revealed multiple anachronisms: the emoji designs, iPhone UI elements, font rendering, and contact information display did not match any version of iOS that existed at the time the messages were claimed to have been sent. The defendant moved for dismissal on the basis of fabricated evidence, and the court granted dismissal with prejudice together with sanctions. The Second Circuit affirmed. The case has become a widely-cited authority in discussions of fabricated digital evidence, illustrating that even visual screenshots, which appear straightforwardly authentic, carry embedded signals of their true creation environment that can expose fabrication.

Outcome

Dismissed with prejudice. Sanctions awarded. Affirmed on appeal.

Sources

Secondary source

AnalysisEric Goldman Tech & Law Blog: analysis with citation

Public proof. Private work.

immut records a cryptographic hash of your file on the public XRP Ledger at the moment of creation. The timestamp is independently verifiable by anyone.

Anchor your evidence

Evidence Record

See all 43 rulings on record.

Jurisdiction filters, evidence-type filters, and authority sources linked on every case.

Back to all cases|Get started free