immut is the Evidence Trust Layer. It sits underneath your existing compliance tools and anchors every file to the XRP Ledger blockchain with a precise timestamp. This creates tamper-evident, independently verifiable proof that a document existed at a specific moment — court-admissible in 88 countries.

Is blockchain evidence accepted in court?

Yes. Blockchain-anchored evidence has been accepted as legal evidence in US Federal Court (US v. Sterlingov, 2024), the EUIPO across all 27 EU member states (AZ Factory v. Valeria Moda, 2025), China's Supreme People's Court (1,400+ IP cases since 2018), and under EU Regulation 2025/2531. immut certificates are accepted in 88 countries and 171 jurisdictions.

Does my file leave my device?

No. immut generates a SHA-256 hash of your file on your own device. Only the hash is recorded on the blockchain. Your original file never leaves your infrastructure. Public proof. Private work.

Does immut replace Vanta or Drata?

No. immut is the proof layer that sits underneath your existing compliance tools. Vanta and Drata collect your evidence. immut proves when that evidence existed. They complement each other — immut adds the independent timestamp your compliance platform cannot provide.

Which compliance standards does immut support?

immut produces records that satisfy evidence requirements in ISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, SOC 2, GDPR, HMRC R&D, HSE health and safety, KYC/AML, EU AI Act, HIPAA, and more. Any standard that requires dated, tamper-evident records is supported.

What happens if immut shuts down?

Every certificate already issued remains independently verifiable on the public XRP Ledger. The proof does not depend on immut existing. A regulator, a judge, or opposing counsel can verify your certificate on the public blockchain at any time, with or without immut.

Evidence Record

UK, Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal · 2023 · Fabrication

Lillywhite (Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal)

SDT Case 12476 (2023)

Backdated documentEmail

What happened

A solicitor practising at Dentons backdated a key internal memorandum of appropriation and accompanied it with a misleading email to their client designed to conceal the backdating. The fabrication was identified in professional regulatory proceedings. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal found the conduct proved and ordered the solicitor to be struck off the roll: the most severe sanction available, equivalent to disbarment. The case is notable because it shows that professionals whose role includes advising on compliance and record-keeping are themselves subject to the same evidential standards they advise clients to meet. A solicitor's own file, in a centralised document management system, carries no independent proof of when its documents were created. Blockchain-anchored working papers would provide exactly that proof against this category of regulatory finding.

Outcome

Struck off the roll: the most severe sanction available to the tribunal.

Sources

Authority source confirmed

AuthSDT: case 12476 judgment page

AuthSDT: judgment PDF

Public proof. Private work.

immut records a cryptographic hash of your file on the public XRP Ledger at the moment of creation. The timestamp is independently verifiable by anyone.

Anchor your evidence

Evidence Record

See all 43 rulings on record.

Jurisdiction filters, evidence-type filters, and authority sources linked on every case.

Back to all cases|Get started free