immut is the Evidence Trust Layer. It sits underneath your existing compliance tools and anchors every file to the XRP Ledger blockchain with a precise timestamp. This creates tamper-evident, independently verifiable proof that a document existed at a specific moment — court-admissible in 88 countries.

Is blockchain evidence accepted in court?

Yes. Blockchain-anchored evidence has been accepted as legal evidence in US Federal Court (US v. Sterlingov, 2024), the EUIPO across all 27 EU member states (AZ Factory v. Valeria Moda, 2025), China's Supreme People's Court (1,400+ IP cases since 2018), and under EU Regulation 2025/2531. immut certificates are accepted in 88 countries and 171 jurisdictions.

Does my file leave my device?

No. immut generates a SHA-256 hash of your file on your own device. Only the hash is recorded on the blockchain. Your original file never leaves your infrastructure. Public proof. Private work.

Does immut replace Vanta or Drata?

No. immut is the proof layer that sits underneath your existing compliance tools. Vanta and Drata collect your evidence. immut proves when that evidence existed. They complement each other — immut adds the independent timestamp your compliance platform cannot provide.

Which compliance standards does immut support?

immut produces records that satisfy evidence requirements in ISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, SOC 2, GDPR, HMRC R&D, HSE health and safety, KYC/AML, EU AI Act, HIPAA, and more. Any standard that requires dated, tamper-evident records is supported.

What happens if immut shuts down?

Every certificate already issued remains independently verifiable on the public XRP Ledger. The proof does not depend on immut existing. A regulator, a judge, or opposing counsel can verify your certificate on the public blockchain at any time, with or without immut.

Evidence Record

UK High Court, Administrative Court · 2017 · Fabrication

Accident Exchange Ltd v Broom and Others

[2017] EWHC 1096 (Admin)

Centralised databaseDocument metadata

What happened

Accident Exchange Ltd was found to have fabricated evidence on an industrial scale across numerous personal injury cases. The scheme involved manipulating telephone records and altering expert reports, with the false records sourced from Autofocus Ltd's centralised claims database. Forensic analysis of the database records revealed that calls claimed to have taken place had never occurred, and that expert reports had been modified. The court found deliberate, systematic fabrication spanning multiple cases and multiple parties. Contempt proceedings followed. The case is significant because it demonstrates that third-party centralised databases, not just a party's own systems, are vulnerable to deliberate manipulation, and that detection required extensive forensic work. An independent, immutable record of each data entry at the point of creation would have made the discrepancies immediately apparent.

Outcome

Systematic fabrication proven across multiple cases. Significant civil and related proceedings followed. Contempt findings against multiple parties.

Sources

Authority source confirmed

AuthBAILII: full judgment

Public proof. Private work.

immut records a cryptographic hash of your file on the public XRP Ledger at the moment of creation. The timestamp is independently verifiable by anyone.

Anchor your evidence

Evidence Record

See all 43 rulings on record.

Jurisdiction filters, evidence-type filters, and authority sources linked on every case.

Back to all cases|Get started free