IP Protection
Intellectual Property Protection in Canada
Canada offers patent protection through CIPO and trade secret protection through provincial common law and Quebec civil law. While Canada lacks a standalone federal trade secret statute, its courts have developed strong protections for confidential business information that blockchain timestamps can powerfully support.
Framework
IP Protection in Canada
Canadian IP law is a mix of federal and provincial jurisdiction. Patents, trade marks, and copyright are governed federally — patents by the Patent Act (administered by CIPO), trade marks by the Trademarks Act, and copyright by the Copyright Act. Trade secrets, however, have no dedicated federal statute and are primarily protected through provincial common law (or civil law in Quebec) under the action for breach of confidence. Canada moved to a first-to-file patent system in 1989, making early documentation of invention dates essential. The Competition Act also provides some protections against industrial espionage.
Trade Secrets
Trade Secret Law in Canada
Canada has no standalone federal trade secret statute. Protection comes through the common law action for breach of confidence (or in Quebec, Articles 1457 and 1612 of the Civil Code) — making proactive documentation of secrecy measures especially important.
The Supreme Court of Canada in Lac Minerals v. International Corona Resources (1989) established the key test: the information must have the quality of confidence, it must have been communicated in confidence, and there must be misuse to the detriment of the party communicating it.
Canadian courts define trade secrets broadly. In Lyse Pharma v. Forest Laboratories (2013), the court confirmed that manufacturing processes, customer lists, pricing strategies, and technical know-how can all qualify as trade secrets.
The Criminal Code (section 391) makes it an offence to fraudulently obtain trade secrets, providing a criminal law backstop alongside civil remedies. However, prosecutions are rare.
Remedies for breach of confidence include injunctions, damages, accounting of profits, and delivery up. Canadian courts have shown willingness to award significant damages in trade secret cases.
Without a statutory definition of 'reasonable steps,' Canadian courts look at the totality of measures taken. Blockchain timestamps provide strong evidence of proactive documentation — critical in a jurisdiction where the burden of proof falls heavily on the trade secret holder.
Patents
Patent System Overview
Typical Cost
CAD $15,000 - $30,000+
Including filing, prosecution, and attorney fees
Timeline
3-4 years
From application to grant
Process Steps
File a patent application with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO).
CIPO conducts a formality check and assigns the application to an examiner.
Request examination within 4 years of filing (CAD $816 for large entities, $408 for small).
Examiner issues a report assessing novelty, non-obviousness, and utility under the Patent Act.
Respond to examiner reports and amend claims as required.
Patent granted upon allowance. Maintenance fees due annually from years 2-20. Canada uses a first-to-file system since 1989.
Legal Framework
Key Legislation and Case Law
Patent Act (RSC 1985, c. P-4)
(1985)Federal statute governing Canadian patents. Defines patentable subject matter, application procedures, and infringement. Administered by CIPO.
Lac Minerals v. International Corona Resources
(1989)Supreme Court of Canada landmark decision establishing the three-part test for breach of confidence in Canadian law: quality of confidence, communicated in confidence, and misuse causing detriment.
Criminal Code s. 391
(Ongoing)Makes it a criminal offence to fraudulently obtain trade secrets. Provides a maximum penalty of imprisonment, though prosecutions remain uncommon.
Canada Evidence Act
(1985)Federal statute governing the admissibility of evidence in federal court proceedings. Section 31.1-31.8 addresses electronic documents, providing a framework for the admissibility of blockchain records.
Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA)
(2000)Federal privacy law that also establishes the legal validity of electronic documents and electronic signatures, supporting the evidentiary value of blockchain timestamps.
Quebec Civil Code (Arts. 1457, 1612)
(1991)In Quebec, trade secrets are protected under the civil law obligation not to cause harm to others and contractual obligations. Provides a separate but complementary framework to common law provinces.
Blockchain in Courts
Blockchain Evidence in Canada
Blockchain evidence is admissible under the Canada Evidence Act and provincial rules
The Canada Evidence Act (sections 31.1-31.8) provides a comprehensive framework for electronic documents. Blockchain records can be authenticated as electronic documents under this framework.
Section 31.1 defines an electronic document broadly as 'data that is recorded or stored on any medium in or by a computer system' — blockchain records clearly meet this definition.
Provincial evidence acts across Canada similarly provide for the admissibility of electronic records. Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, and other provinces all have modern electronic evidence provisions.
Canadian courts have increasingly dealt with cryptocurrency and blockchain technology, building judicial familiarity with the technology that supports the acceptance of blockchain timestamps in IP disputes.
immut
How immut Helps in Canada
Provide critical evidence of proactive confidentiality measures in a jurisdiction where the burden of proof for trade secret protection falls on the information holder.
Establish creation dates that support patent priority under Canada's first-to-file system, in effect since 1989.
Generate blockchain timestamps admissible under the Canada Evidence Act across all federal courts and provincial superior courts.
Offer protection valid in all 10 provinces and 3 territories, regardless of variations in provincial trade secret common law.
Save over 99% compared to Canadian patent costs (CAD $15-30K+) with instant blockchain-verified protection.
Support trade secret claims in both common law provinces and Quebec's civil law system with jurisdiction-neutral blockchain evidence.
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Canada have a federal trade secrets law?
No. Unlike the US (which has the DTSA) or the EU (which has the Trade Secrets Directive), Canada has no standalone federal trade secret statute. Protection comes from provincial common law (breach of confidence) or Quebec civil law. This makes proactive documentation through tools like immut even more important.
Is blockchain evidence accepted in Canadian courts?
Yes. The Canada Evidence Act provides a framework for electronic documents that covers blockchain records. Provincial evidence acts similarly provide for electronic evidence admissibility. Canadian courts have growing familiarity with blockchain technology through cryptocurrency cases.
How does Canadian trade secret law compare to the US?
Canada relies on common law breach of confidence rather than a dedicated statute. The US has the federal DTSA and state UTSA laws. Canada's approach is more flexible but less predictable. Both require evidence of reasonable secrecy measures, which immut provides.
Can immut timestamps support Canadian patent applications?
While immut timestamps don't replace patent filings, they establish documented invention dates under Canada's first-to-file system. They can prove prior art, support inventorship claims, and provide evidence in patent disputes — all at a fraction of the CAD $15-30K patent cost.
Is trade secret protection different in Quebec?
Yes. Quebec uses civil law rather than common law. Trade secrets are protected under Articles 1457 and 1612 of the Civil Code, based on the obligation not to cause harm and contractual obligations. immut's blockchain timestamps are equally effective as evidence under both legal systems.
Protect Your IP in Canada
Get blockchain-verified proof of your intellectual property in 60 seconds. Court-admissible in Canada and recognised internationally.