AI Patent vs Trade Secret: Which Strategy Protects Your AI Innovation?
Your AI model, training data, or algorithm is valuable. But should you patent it or keep it as a trade secret? The answer is not straightforward — and most AI companies miss a third option that combines the best of both.
Key Takeaway
For most AI companies, trade secrets beat patents — but only if you can prove when you created your innovation. Blockchain timestamps give you the evidence layer that trade secrets lack: court-admissible proof of your creation date, without the disclosure that patents require.
In This Guide
1. The AI IP Challenge
AI innovations are uniquely difficult to protect. Traditional IP frameworks were designed for physical inventions and clearly defined processes — not for neural network architectures, training methodologies, and proprietary datasets.
The core tension: patents require you to disclose exactly how your AI works, giving competitors a blueprint. Trade secrets keep your methods hidden but give you no proof of when you created them.
AI IP by the Numbers
This mismatch between AI development speed and patent timelines is why many AI companies are rethinking their IP strategy entirely.
2. The Patent Route for AI
AI patents are possible but challenging. Patent offices in the US, EU, and UK have specific rules about what AI-related inventions qualify for patent protection.
What Can Be Patented in AI
AI applied to solve a specific technical problem (e.g., image recognition for medical diagnosis, natural language processing for fraud detection).
New neural network designs that achieve a technical effect beyond what was previously possible.
Pure mathematical methods or abstract AI concepts — these are generally not patentable in the UK or EU.
The weights and parameters of a trained model are typically not patentable — they are data, not an invention.
The Problems with AI Patents
Disclosure risk: You must describe your AI system in enough detail for someone skilled in the art to reproduce it. Your competitors will read your patent.
Speed mismatch: Patent prosecution takes 2-5 years. Your AI model may be obsolete by the time the patent is granted.
Enforcement difficulty: Proving someone infringes your AI patent is extremely difficult when you cannot inspect their model internals.
High cost: £50,000-£100,000+ for multi-jurisdiction AI patent prosecution, with no guarantee of success.
3. The Trade Secret Route for AI
Many of the world's most valuable AI systems are protected as trade secrets, not patents. Google's search algorithm, OpenAI's training methodologies, and countless proprietary models rely on secrecy rather than patents.
What Trade Secrets Protect in AI
The Trade Secret Weakness
The critical weakness of trade secrets: if someone independently develops the same AI technique, you have no recourse. And if a dispute arises about who created something first, you need evidence of when you developed your innovation.
This is where most AI companies have a gap. They treat their AI as a trade secret but have no independent proof of when it was created. Internal Git commits and cloud logs are controlled by the company — courts view them sceptically. Proper trade secret documentation requires something more robust.
4. Side-by-Side Comparison
The comparison reveals a clear gap: trade secrets are better suited to AI but lack the evidence trail that patents provide. This is why a growing number of AI companies are adopting a third approach.
5. The Third Option: Blockchain Timestamps
Blockchain timestamps solve the fundamental weakness of trade secrets for AI companies: the lack of independent proof of when your innovation existed.
By timestamping your AI assets on the blockchain, you get the secrecy of trade secrets combined with the evidence trail of patents — without the cost, disclosure, or delay of either.
What AI Companies Timestamp
Model Architecture Documents
Timestamp your architecture designs, layer configurations, and novel techniques. Proves you developed the approach before a competitor files a patent on something similar.
Training Data and Pipelines
Your curated datasets and preprocessing pipelines are often more valuable than the model itself. Timestamp them to prove ownership and creation date without revealing the data.
Research and Experiments
Timestamp experiment results, benchmark comparisons, and research notebooks. Creates an audit trail that proves your R&D timeline for investors, acquirers, or courts.
Model Snapshots
Timestamp model checkpoints at key milestones. Proves the state of your AI at specific points in time — valuable for IP due diligence during funding rounds or acquisitions.
"The AI companies that will win IP disputes in the next decade are the ones building evidence today. Not patents — evidence. Immutable, timestamped records of what they created and when."
6. Building Your AI IP Strategy
The best AI IP strategy is not patent OR trade secret — it is a layered approach that uses the right tool for each asset.
Recommended AI IP Stack
Blockchain timestamps (everything)
Timestamp all AI assets as they are created. This is your baseline evidence layer — fast, cheap, and comprehensive.
Trade secrets (core algorithms and data)
Protect your most valuable AI assets as trade secrets with proper documentation and access controls. The blockchain timestamps provide the proof of creation that trade secrets lack.
Patents (selectively)
Patent only your most defensible, technically novel AI inventions — the ones that are difficult to reverse-engineer and have clear commercial value. Use as a strategic complement rather than primary protection.
This layered approach costs a fraction of a patent-first strategy while providing stronger overall protection. You protect everything instantly with timestamps, document your trade secrets properly, and save patent budgets for the innovations that truly warrant them.
7. Frequently Asked Questions
Can I patent an AI algorithm?
Pure algorithms are not patentable. However, an AI system that applies an algorithm to solve a specific technical problem may be patentable. The key is demonstrating a concrete technical effect, not just an abstract mathematical method.
What if a competitor patents my AI technique after I developed it?
If you have blockchain-timestamped evidence proving you developed the technique before their patent filing date, you can use this as prior art to challenge their patent. In many jurisdictions, you also have a prior user right to continue using your own invention.
How do investors view AI IP without patents?
Increasingly, sophisticated investors understand that trade secrets + documented evidence can be more valuable than AI patents. What they want is proof that you own your IP and can defend it. Blockchain timestamps provide exactly that evidence.
Should I timestamp my training data?
Yes. Your curated, cleaned, and labelled training datasets are often more valuable than the model. Timestamping proves you assembled the dataset at a specific time — critical for ownership disputes, licensing negotiations, and demonstrating the provenance of your AI system.
Does blockchain timestamping reveal my AI secrets?
No. Only a cryptographic hash of your file is recorded on the blockchain — not the file itself. Your AI code, data, and methods remain completely private. The hash proves the document existed at that time without revealing its contents.
Related Resources
Related Guides
Protect Your AI Innovation Today
Do not wait for a competitor to patent your technique. Book a call to see how immut creates court-ready proof of your AI innovations in 60 seconds.
Timestamp your first AI asset on the call — blockchain-verified evidence from just £10
About immut: immut provides blockchain-based intellectual property protection for AI companies, researchers, and innovators. Our platform creates permanent, court-ready proof of creation in seconds — from just £10. Learn more at immut.io.